Business Continuity & Disaster Recovery

Your DR document
is not a DR strategy.
BC Manifests are.

FalconIO replaces static runbooks with BC Manifests — versioned, topology-aware resilience declarations that execute via Pulumi, measure actual recovery against declared targets, integrate directly with incident management, and generate compliance evidence continuously.

RTO/RPO as Code Chaos Pre-Calculated ISO 22301 Ready SOC 2 Evidence

The runbook was written against
infrastructure that no longer exists.

📄
RTO/RPO Without Validation

RTO and RPO are commitments made by a person who had no mechanism to validate them against actual system topology. When the incident happens, the number is a guess.

📅
Calendar-Based Testing

DR tests are scheduled events — the gap between tests is exactly when failure mode drift accumulates. The plan is validated once, then becomes stale immediately.

🔗
Polyglot Persistence Breaks Templates

ScyllaDB, CockroachDB, Redpanda — failover ordering depends on cross-system dependency graphs that every standard DR template assumes away. Your stack is not generic. Your DR shouldn't be either.

🛠️
Manual Runbooks Under Pressure

Manual runbooks demand sequential human decision-making under maximum operational stress, with context spread across tools that were never designed to work together.

🔀
Incident and DR Are Separate

When a DR event also creates an incident, context must be assembled manually between two separate tools while the clock runs. This friction costs MTTR points every time.

📋
Compliance Reconstructed

ISO 22301 and SOC 2 evidence is assembled retrospectively, under audit pressure, from incomplete records that were never designed to be compliance artefacts.

Declare resilience.
Execute it. Measure it.

A BC Manifest is a versioned declaration stored in CockroachDB alongside the topology graph it describes. It specifies the service tier it covers, the declared RTO and RPO, the downstream dependency ordering for recovery sequencing, the Pulumi stacks that execute the failover, and the compliance artefact it generates as evidence.

It is not documentation. It is an executable, testable, topology-linked specification of how your system recovers. Pulumi executes BC Manifests — not Crossplane. Failover is imperative, sequenced, and conditional on observed state. Crossplane's reconciliation model handles steady-state management after recovery is confirmed.

Pulumi provisions the foundation. Crossplane manages the steady state. Pulumi executes the failover. Each does what the other cannot.
BC Manifests per service, per tier — version-controlled, topology-linked, executable
Pulumi stack execution — failover stacks tested before they run, deterministic, fully audited
Chaos scheduler with blast radius pre-calculation — every experiment modelled against current topology graph before any disruption
Semi-automated runbooks — platform handles sequencing and verification, operator confirms critical thresholds
Polyglot failover sequencing — CockroachDB, ScyllaDB, Redpanda, Postgres — order from actual dependency graph
Multi-cloud failover — active-active, active-passive, tiered recovery across AWS, GCP, Azure, OCI
Direct incident integration — BC activation from incident ticket, every step logged in same timeline
RTO actual vs declared — every test and activation measured against declared target
MTTR and MTBF trending — recovery velocity as a platform KPI, visible in unified dashboard

Evidence generated.
Not assembled.

FalconIO generates compliance artefacts from operational reality — not from documentation written for the audit. When an auditor arrives, you export. You do not reconstruct.

BC Manifest Version History

Maintained, reviewed resilience posture across time. Proof that declarations are kept current and reviewed, not written once and forgotten.

Chaos Test Log

Continuous DR validation with scheduled and ad-hoc test records. Proof that you test your resilience, not just describe it.

Incident Timelines

Automated telemetry correlation with detection, response, and recovery quality. Proof of operational response capability — from real incidents, not simulations.

RTO Actual vs Declared Log

Commitments are measurable and are measured. Every activation and test records actual recovery time against declared target — divergence triggers a review ticket.

Failover Execution Audit Trails

Recovery is platform-executed, not improvised. Every automated action logged with timestamp, decision rationale, and outcome state.

Change Management Trail

Controlled infrastructure change process — from the incident management module. Proof that every infrastructure change is tracked, approved, and auditable.